The Michigan Supreme Court has issued a unanimous ruling clarifying that state courts cannot automatically prohibit cannabis use for individuals on probation based solely on federal marijuana laws.
In the case People v. Hess, the court determined that lower courts improperly relied on federal cannabis prohibition when upholding probation conditions that barred marijuana use. The decision strengthens protections provided under Michigan’s adult-use cannabis law and reinforces the state’s authority to regulate cannabis independent of federal policy.
Writing for the court, Justice Elizabeth Welch pointed to the Michigan Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Ter Beek v. City of Wyoming. In that case, the court found that Michigan’s medical cannabis protections were not overridden by federal marijuana laws. Welch explained that the same legal reasoning applies to Michigan’s adult-use cannabis framework established through the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA).
According to the ruling, individuals who use cannabis in compliance with the MRTMA are protected from penalties and the loss of rights or privileges based solely on that lawful use. The court further emphasized that when provisions of the MRTMA conflict with other state laws, including aspects of the probation system, the cannabis law takes precedence.
Welch also criticized the Michigan Court of Appeals for placing too much weight on federal cannabis prohibition rather than following established Michigan precedent. The Supreme Court concluded that federal law prohibiting recreational marijuana does not invalidate or preempt the protections granted under Michigan’s adult-use cannabis statute.
The ruling does not eliminate a judge’s ability to restrict cannabis use during probation in every circumstance. Montcalm County Prosecutor Thomas Ginster, who argued the case on behalf of the state, noted that courts may still impose cannabis restrictions when supported by individualized assessments that identify substance-use concerns or other specific risks.
However, Ginster expressed concerns about the practical challenges of conducting individualized evaluations for every probation case, particularly in smaller jurisdictions with limited staffing and resources.
The decision is expected to have significant implications for probation practices throughout Michigan, ensuring that courts cannot rely solely on federal marijuana prohibition when determining whether a probationer may legally use cannabis under state law.
Source: Detroit Free Press reporting on the Michigan Supreme Court’s decision in People v. Hess.
Stay in the loop with all things Illinois Cannabis by joining the Couch Lock’d Newsletter here!
Become a Couch Lock’d Member.
Find our latest reviews here.
Hosting an event & need a consumption bar? Hit us up here.
Save money with our affiliate links here.
Get your Illinois Medical Card for $75 now with our link here or code “CouchLockd”!